HLS vs MJPEG: Comprehensive Comparison for Video Streaming Protocols (2025 Guide)

A thorough technical guide comparing HLS and MJPEG streaming protocols for developers. Covers compression, latency, bandwidth, use cases, and implementation with code.

HLS vs MJPEG: Comprehensive Comparison for Video Streaming (2025)

Selecting the right video streaming protocol is crucial for developers and engineers building reliable and efficient streaming solutions. With the surge in real-time video applications, understanding the differences between HLS vs MJPEG is more important than ever. Both protocols have unique strengths and are widely used in various scenarios, from live event broadcasting to security camera feeds and IoT devices. This guide offers a deep dive into HLS vs MJPEG, outlining their technical aspects, bandwidth usage, latency, compression efficiency, and best use cases for 2025 and beyond.

What is HLS?

HTTP

Live Streaming

 (HLS) is a robust video streaming protocol developed by Apple. It segments video content into small, HTTP-based file chunks, allowing adaptive bitrate streaming across a range of devices and network conditions. As opposed to legacy streaming techniques, HLS is designed to deliver high-quality video seamlessly, even over unreliable networks.
A core advantage in the hls vs mjpeg debate is HLS’s ability to adjust quality dynamically, which is ideal for

live streaming

, video on demand, and large-scale distributions. It supports encryption, DVR capabilities, and is compatible with modern browsers, smart TVs, and mobile devices. Use cases for HLS include live events, OTT media services, and sports streaming where bandwidth efficiency and adaptive quality are paramount. In the context of hls vs mjpeg, HLS stands out for scalability, reliability, and advanced features. For developers looking to add real-time communication features, integrating a

Video Calling API

 alongside HLS can further enhance interactive streaming experiences.

What is MJPEG?

Motion JPEG (MJPEG) is a simple video streaming protocol where each video frame is compressed as a separate JPEG image and sent in sequence over HTTP or RTP. Unlike HLS, MJPEG lacks video compression between frames, resulting in higher bandwidth usage but ultra-low latency.
In the hls vs mjpeg discussion, MJPEG’s simplicity makes it a preferred choice for applications where real-time response is critical and hardware resources are limited. Commonly used in security cameras, embedded vision systems, and IoT devices, MJPEG streams are easy to decode and display in most web browsers without plugins. However, the lack of inter-frame compression means higher network and storage requirements compared to HLS. The hls vs mjpeg comparison highlights MJPEG’s strengths in low-latency, real-time, and resource-constrained environments. If you're developing for mobile or embedded systems, exploring

webrtc android

 can offer additional insights into real-time video streaming on Android devices.

HLS vs MJPEG: Technical Comparison

When considering hls vs mjpeg for your streaming application, it’s essential to compare their technical attributes side by side. Below is a detailed comparison of compression, bandwidth, latency, quality, hardware/software requirements, and compatibility.
For those building cross-platform video solutions, leveraging a

javascript video and audio calling sdk

 can streamline the integration of video and audio communication features, regardless of the streaming protocol you choose.

Compression Efficiency

  • HLS: Utilizes modern codecs (e.g., H.264, H.265) with inter-frame compression, significantly reducing network load.
  • MJPEG: Only intra-frame compression; each frame is a standalone JPEG, leading to higher bandwidth usage.

Bandwidth Usage

  • HLS: More efficient due to advanced codecs and adaptive bitrate streaming.
  • MJPEG: Typically requires more bandwidth for the same quality, as each frame is individually compressed.

Latency

  • HLS: Higher latency (typically 5-30 seconds), which can be mitigated with low-latency extensions but still lags behind MJPEG.
  • MJPEG: Extremely low latency, ideal for real-time applications like robotics or security monitoring.

Quality at Different Bitrates

  • HLS: Adapts quality to network conditions, providing smooth playback even on fluctuating connections.
  • MJPEG: Delivers consistent quality, but is less efficient at lower bitrates.

Hardware/Software Requirements

  • HLS: Requires moderate processing power for decoding advanced codecs and managing playlists.
  • MJPEG: Minimal requirements; can be decoded by almost any device or browser.

Browser and Device Compatibility

  • HLS: Natively supported in Safari, most mobile devices, and with JavaScript libraries (like hls.js) in other browsers.
  • MJPEG: Directly supported via <img> tags or minimal JavaScript in nearly all browsers. For developers working with Flutter,

    flutter webrtc

     provides a robust approach to real-time video streaming on both mobile and web platforms.

Pros and Cons: HLS vs MJPEG

Pros and Cons of HLS

  • Pros:
    • Adaptive bitrate streaming for optimal quality
    • Efficient network usage with modern codecs
    • Broad support across devices and browsers in 2025
    • Supports DRM, encryption, and DVR features
    • Scalable for large audiences
  • Cons:
    • Higher latency compared to MJPEG
    • More complex to implement and configure
    • Requires more powerful hardware for encoding/decoding
For teams looking to quickly integrate communication features, you can

embed video calling sdk

 solutions into your web or mobile apps without extensive custom development.

Pros and Cons of MJPEG

  • Pros:
    • Simplicity of implementation and decoding
    • Ultra-low latency, perfect for real-time applications
    • Minimal hardware resources required
    • Easy integration into web pages and lightweight clients
  • Cons:
    • High bandwidth usage due to lack of inter-frame compression
    • No adaptive bitrate or advanced streaming features
    • Lower efficiency at scale, not ideal for large audiences
    • Limited quality control at lower bitrates
If you're building native mobile applications, especially with React Native, consider using a

react native video and audio calling sdk

 to enable seamless video and audio communication alongside your streaming features.

Implementation Guide: How to Stream Using HLS or MJPEG

Setting Up HLS Streaming

To create an HLS stream, you can use tools like FFmpeg or GStreamer. Here’s how to generate an HLS stream from a video source:
FFmpeg Example: bash ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -codec: copy -start_number 0 -hls_time 4 -hls_list_size 0 -f hls output.m3u8
GStreamer Example: bash gst-launch-1.0 filesrc location=input.mp4 ! decodebin ! x264enc ! mpegtsmux ! hlssink playlist-root=http://localhost:8080 location=segment%05d.ts playlist-location=playlist.m3u8
These commands segment the video and create an HLS-compatible playlist. You can serve the generated .m3u8 and segment files using any standard HTTP server.
For those interested in adding live interactivity to their streams, integrating a

Video Calling API

 can enable real-time communication features for your audience.

Setting Up MJPEG Streaming

MJPEG streaming can be implemented with minimal setup. Here’s how to stream MJPEG from a camera or video file using FFmpeg or GStreamer:
FFmpeg Example: bash ffmpeg -f v4l2 -i /dev/video0 -vf "fps=25,format=yuvj422p" -f mjpeg http://localhost:8080/video.mjpeg
GStreamer Example: bash gst-launch-1.0 v4l2src device=/dev/video0 ! jpegenc ! multipartmux ! tcpserversink host=0.0.0.0 port=8080
These pipelines capture raw video, encode frames as JPEG, and stream them over HTTP or TCP. MJPEG streams are often embedded in web interfaces with a simple HTML <img> tag:
1<img src=\"http://localhost:8080/video.mjpeg\" />
2

Best Use Cases: When to Choose HLS vs MJPEG

Choosing between hls vs mjpeg depends on your project’s requirements:
  • HLS is best for:
    • Large-scale live events, webinars, OTT media, and where adaptive streaming is needed
    • Scenarios where bandwidth efficiency and playback on multiple devices are priorities
    • Environments requiring advanced features like DRM, encryption, and DVR
  • MJPEG is best for:
    • Security cameras, robotics, and embedded vision where real-time response is critical
    • IoT devices and applications with limited processing power
    • Scenarios where simplicity and ultra-low latency outweigh bandwidth concerns
The hls vs mjpeg choice should align with your latency, bandwidth, and device compatibility needs. For high-quality, adaptive streaming, HLS is preferred; for rapid, resource-light applications, MJPEG excels.
If you're ready to experiment with advanced video streaming and communication features,

Try it for free

 and see how these protocols can be integrated into your next project.

Conclusion: HLS vs MJPEG – Which Should You Choose?

In summary, the hls vs mjpeg debate hinges on the specific requirements of your video streaming application. HLS is ideal for high-quality, scalable, and adaptive streaming across diverse devices, while MJPEG is unmatched for simplicity and real-time responsiveness. Evaluate your project’s demands for latency, bandwidth, and scalability in 2025 to select the right protocol. By understanding the strengths and limitations of both, developers can build robust, efficient, and future-ready streaming solutions.

Get 10,000 Free Minutes Every Months

No credit card required to start.

Want to level-up your learning? Subscribe now

Subscribe to our newsletter for more tech based insights

FAQ