End of Life for Twilio Programmable Video - Upgrade to VideoSDKLearn More

HLS vs LL-HLS: Key Difference Between Two Streaming Protocols

Explore the key differences between HLS and LL-HLS, including their latency, features, and benefits. Learn how to implement these protocols for optimized video streaming and real-time interaction.

What are the Streaming Protocols?

Streaming protocols are essential for delivering media content over the internet. They define how data packets are transferred, ensuring smooth playback without interruptions. Among the many protocols available, HTTP Live Streaming (HLS) and Low-Latency HLS (LL-HLS) stand out due to their widespread adoption and efficiency.
HLS, developed by Apple, has become a standard for delivering video content, especially for video-on-demand (VOD) services. However, its higher latency, ranging from 10 to 30 seconds, can be a drawback for live events where real-time interaction is crucial.
LL-HLS addresses this issue by reducing latency to as low as 2-3 seconds, making it ideal for live sports, gaming, and other interactive broadcasts. This article will explore the differences between HLS and LL-HLS, their implementations, and the benefits they offer for various use cases.

What is HTTP Live Streaming (HLS)?

HLS (

HTTP Live Streaming

) was introduced by Apple in 2009 as a method to stream media content over the internet. It works by breaking the video into small segments, which are then delivered to the viewer's device over HTTP. The segments are downloaded and played sequentially, allowing for adaptive bitrate streaming. This means the video quality can dynamically adjust based on the viewer's internet connection speed, providing a smooth viewing experience even with fluctuating bandwidth.
One of the key features of HLS is its compatibility. Since it uses standard HTTP, it works seamlessly across various devices and platforms, including iOS, Android, smart TVs, and web browsers. This broad compatibility has made HLS a popular choice for streaming services like Netflix, YouTube, and Hulu.
HLS is also resilient. It can handle network interruptions and automatically switch to lower bitrates if the connection weakens, ensuring continuous playback. However, the larger segment sizes (typically 6-10 seconds) can introduce significant latency, making HLS less suitable for live broadcasts where immediacy is crucial.

What is Low-Latency HLS (LL-HLS)?

LL-HLS (

Low-Latency HLS

) is an extension of the traditional HLS protocol designed to reduce latency significantly. Apple introduced LL-HLS to address the need for more immediate content delivery, which is essential for live events, interactive streaming, and real-time applications.
The primary difference between HLS and LL-HLS lies in the segment size and the frequency of playlist updates. LL-HLS uses shorter segments, often sub-second in length, which are transmitted to the viewer's device as soon as they are available. This approach minimizes the delay between content capture and playback, reducing latency to as low as 2-3 seconds.
LL-HLS also employs several technical enhancements to achieve low latency:
  • Partial Segments: Instead of waiting for an entire segment to be ready, LL-HLS sends smaller parts of the segment as they are encoded.
  • HTTP/2 Push: This technology allows servers to push data to the client without waiting for a request, further reducing wait times (

    Cloudinary

    )​​(

    Castr

    ).
  • Preload Hints: These hints inform the client about upcoming segments, enabling it to fetch data in advance and reducing buffering.
These innovations make LL-HLS a powerful tool for delivering high-quality, low-latency streams. However, implementing LL-HLS can be more complex and may require more resources compared to traditional HLS.

HLS vs LL-HLS: Difference Between Two Streaming Protocol

FeatureHLS (HTTP Live Streaming)LL-HLS (Low-Latency HTTP Live Streaming)
Latency10-30 seconds2-3 seconds
Segment SizeLarger segments (6-10 seconds)Smaller segments (less than 1 second)
Delivery SpeedSmooth playback with fluctuating networkFaster delivery and playback
Playlist UpdatesLess frequent updatesMore frequent updates with delta playlists
Data Transfer EfficiencyEntire playlist sent during updatesOnly changes sent during updates
Compatibility and Device SupportBroad support across devices and platformsGrowing support, primarily driven by Apple
Use CasesSuitable for on-demand contentSuitable for applications requiring real-time interaction
Segment DurationTypically 6-10 secondsShorter segments (1-2 seconds)
Playback Start TimeSlower, due to larger segmentsFaster, due to shorter segments
Adaptive BitrateSupportedSupported
BufferingMore prone to buffering issuesReduced buffering with faster start time
Use Case SuitabilityGeneral streaming, VODLive events, interactive streaming
Network LoadHigher due to longer segmentsPotentially lower, optimized for low latency
Implementation ComplexitySimpler, well-establishedMore complex, newer technology
HTTP/2 SupportLimitedDesigned to take advantage of HTTP/2
Chunked Transfer EncodingRarely usedFrequently used for reducing latency
Initial LatencyHigherLower
Buffer ManagementSimpleComplex, requires precise management
Viewer ExperienceGood for non-interactive contentOptimized for real-time interactivity

Implementing HLS and LL-HLS in Video Streaming

Steps to Set Up HLS:

Step 1. Segmenting the Video:

Convert the video into smaller segments using a tool like FFmpeg.

Step 2. Creating the Playlist:

Generate an M3U8 playlist file that lists the segments in order.

Step 3. Setting Up the Server:

Host the segments and playlist on an HTTP server.

Step 4. Embedding the Player:

Use an HLS-compatible player (e.g., Video.js, JW Player) to stream the video on your website.

Steps to Set Up LL-HLS:

Step 1. Segmenting the Video:

Use shorter segment durations (sub-second) with tools like FFmpeg, ensuring each segment is encoded quickly.

Step 2. Generating Partial Segments:

Create partial segments and use EXT-X-PART tags to list them in the playlist.

Step 3. HTTP/2 Push Setup:

Configure your server to use HTTP/2 push to send segments proactively.

Step 4. Preload Hints and Delta Updates:

Implement EXT-X-PRELOAD-HINT tags to inform the client of upcoming segments and use delta updates to minimize data transfer.
Here’s a basic FFmpeg command for segmenting a video for HLS:

bash

1ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -codec: copy -start_number 0 -hls_time 10 -hls_list_size 0 -f hls index.m3u8
For LL-HLS, you would adjust the segment duration and include partial segments:

bash

1ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -codec: copy -start_number 0 -hls_time 1 -hls_list_size 0 -hls_flags split_by_time -hls_segment_type fmp4 -hls_playlist_type event -master_pl_name master.m3u8 index.m3u8
Additionally, configure your server to support HTTP/2 push and include EXT-X-PRELOAD-HINT in your playlists.

Advanced Features and Enhancements

1. HTTP/2 Push Technology:

LL-HLS leverages HTTP/2 push to reduce latency. This feature allows the server to send video segments to the client before they are explicitly requested, ensuring a continuous and smooth playback experience.

2. Preload Hints and Rendition Reports:

LL-HLS uses preload hints (EXT-X-PRELOAD-HINT) to inform the client about upcoming segments, enabling it to fetch data in advance and reduce buffering times. Rendition reports (EXT-X-RENDITION-REPORT) minimize roundtrips during bitrate adaptation by providing information about the last media sequence and part numbers..

3. Adaptive Bitrate Streaming (ABR):

Both HLS and LL-HLS support adaptive bitrate streaming, which adjusts the video quality based on the viewer’s network conditions. This ensures that the stream remains stable and of high quality, even as network conditions change.
These advanced features and enhancements make LL-HLS a robust solution for delivering low-latency, high-quality streaming experiences. However, implementing these features requires careful planning and technical expertise.

Benefits of Low Latency Streaming

1. Enhanced Viewer Experience:

Low latency streaming creates a more engaging and immersive viewer experience. It allows viewers to feel connected to live events as they unfold, reducing the frustration associated with delays..

2. Real-Time Interaction Possibilities:

Low latency is essential for scenarios requiring real-time interaction. In live sports, it ensures viewers experience the action simultaneously, avoiding spoilers. For online gaming, it maintains fairness and responsiveness, crucial for player satisfaction. Interactive webinars benefit from real-time questions and answers, fostering a dynamic learning environment.

3. Increased Engagement and Retention:

Viewers are more likely to stay engaged with content that feels immediate and responsive. This immediacy can lead to higher viewer retention rates and a more loyal audience, as real-time interactions make the content more compelling and personal.

Get Free 10,000 Minutes Every Months

No credit card required to start.

Challenges and Limitations of HLS & LL-HLS

1. Technical Complexities and Implementation Costs:

Implementing LL-HLS is more complex than traditional HLS due to the additional features required for low latency, such as HTTP/2 push, partial segments, and preload hints. These enhancements necessitate careful planning, sophisticated infrastructure, and potentially higher costs, making it a more resource-intensive solution.

2. Network and Bandwidth Considerations:

LL-HLS requires a robust network infrastructure to handle the frequent transmission of smaller segments. Insufficient bandwidth can lead to buffering and degraded video quality, counteracting the benefits of low latency. Therefore, a stable and high-capacity network is crucial for effective LL-HLS deployment.

3. Compatibility Issues:

While LL-HLS is gaining support across various platforms, it remains primarily an Apple-driven technology. This can lead to compatibility issues on non-Apple devices and older hardware that does not support the latest updates. Ensuring wide compatibility requires thorough testing and potentially additional adjustments to accommodate different device.
By addressing these challenges, content creators can leverage the benefits of LL-HLS to provide high-quality, low-latency streaming experiences, enhancing viewer satisfaction and engagement.

Conclusion

In conclusion, choosing between HLS and LL-HLS depends on the specific needs of the streaming application. While HLS offers broad compatibility and robustness for VOD and non-interactive live streams, LL-HLS provides the low latency required for real-time interaction and live events. Understanding the technical differences, implementation challenges, and use cases can help content creators and broadcasters deliver optimal streaming experiences, ensuring high viewer engagement and satisfaction. As technology advances, both protocols will continue to evolve, offering even better solutions for diverse streaming needs.

Want to level-up your learning? Subscribe now

Subscribe to our newsletter for more tech based insights

FAQ