Zoom vs Dyte
A point to point comparison between Zoom SDK and Dyte. And expose features and value offer by VideoSDK.
The Zoom Video SDK provides a reliable video conferencing experience similar to the original Client, but with added flexibility. It encompasses a wide range of services, including audio, video, chat, screen sharing, data streams, server-side APIs, and webhooks. This extensive set of features allows developers to create customized and immersive video communication experiences within their applications.
Dyte provides a real-time video conferencing SDK that facilitates seamless integration of customized, secured, high-quality live video and voice into your web, mobile, and desktop applications and websites with minimal code.
How VideoSDK make a difference
Zoom Video SDK and Dyte SDK are powerful tools for integrating video conferencing into applications. The Zoom Video SDK provides developers with the ability to embed Zoom's robust video capabilities seamlessly, enhancing virtual collaboration. On the other hand, Dyte SDK offers a versatile solution for building custom video applications with real-time communication features. Both SDKs empower developers to create immersive video experiences tailored to their specific needs, fostering innovation in online communication and collaboration.
The VideoSDK revolutionizes live experiences by providing a modern, all-in-one solution for live video, audio calls, streaming, and collaboration. It's a lightweight SDK that makes creating immersive and engaging live experiences simple and seamless.
Let's explore the features and capabilities of VideoSDK in comparison to Dyte and Zoom, highlighting the reasons why VideoSDK stands out as the superior choice for your diverse requirements.
Features Comparison : Zoom vs Dyte vs VideoSDK
Explore features in Zoom Video SDK, Dyte, and VideoSDK for optimal communication. Compare and choose the best solution for seamless collaboration.
features | Zoom Video SDK | Dyte | Video SDK |
---|---|---|---|
No. of participants (Including hosts) | ✕ Zoom Video SDK supports limited participants. | ✕ Dyte SDK supports limited participants. | ✓ VideoSDK supports millions participants. |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ Tough and restrictive | ✕ Dyte SDK easy to integrate but it take more time. | ✓ VideoSDK generally requires more than 2 weeks for SDK integration. |
Adpative audio/video quality | ✕ Adpative audio/video quality not available in Zoom Video SDK. | ✓ Dyte SDK not offers adaptive audio/video quality. | ✓ VideoSDK offers adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall, Private Network | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ Zoom Video SDK offer limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | ✓ Dyte offer custom roles that are specific to your use-case. | ✓ VideoSDK offer Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✕ Not available | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ Not available | ✕ Not available | ✓ In VideoSDK no needed manual configuration. |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✕ In Zoom Video SDK collaborative features are available but it`s limited. | ✓ In Dyte collaborative features is available. | ✓ Collaborative features available VideoSDK. |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ Not available | ✕ Complex Integration. | ✓ Easy integration |
Webhooks | ✕ Only for a few states | ✕ Available | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | ✓ Usage based | ✓ Usage based | ✓ Usage based Price |
Interactive Live Streaming | ✕ Zoom Video SDK not supports interactive live streaming. | ✓ Dyte support Interactive Live Streaming | ✓ VideoSDK supports interactive live streaming. |
Cloud Recording | ✓ Zoom Video SDK offers cloud recording capabilities. | ✓ VideoSDK offers cloud recording capabilities. | ✓ VideoSDK offers cloud recording capabilities. |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✓ Zoom Video SDK provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | ✓ Dyte provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | ✓ VideoSDK provides an interactive whiteboard feature. |
Price Comparison : Zoom vs Dyte vs VideoSDK
Effortlessly compare prices between Zoom Video SDK, Dyte, and VideoSDK to make informed decisions for your video communication solutions.
features | Zoom Video SDK | Dyte | Video SDK |
---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | ✕ Zoom Video SDK not offer the volume discount. | ✕ Dyte not offer the volume discount. | ✓ VideoSDK offer the volume discount. |
Video Conferencing |
| ✕ Dyte Charge $4 per minute for HD only. |
|
Analytics | ✕ No | ✓ Dyte offer free analytics. | ✓ VideoSDK offer free analytics. |
Compliance & Privacy | ✕ Zoom provides robust support for Only SOC 2 Type 2 compliance. | ✕ Dyte provides robust support only HIPPA compliance but it take charge $200/month. | ✓ Secure real-time audio-video to your app or website with compliance and privacy.
|
Cloud recording pricing |
| ✕ Dyte cloud recording pricing is: Video HD: $10.00 1,000 minutes |
|
RTMP pricing |
| ✕ Dyte RTMP pricing is $15 per 1,000 minutes |
|
ILS pricing | NA | Aggregated resolution based per participant pricing |
|
Storage pricing |
| ✕ Extra cost |
|
Support Comparison : Zoom vs Dyte vs VideoSDK
features | Zoom Video SDK | Dyte | Video SDK |
---|---|---|---|
Support | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Cost |
| NA | Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK. |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ No | ✕ no | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ No | ✕ no | ✓ Inexpensive SLA with 99.9% uptime |
FAQ