#1 WebRTC Alternative
Are you looking for a WebRTC alternative?
Get started with Video SDK in just couple of hours with highly customisable UI kits.
- In built, chat, poll, whiteboard, Q&A.
- End to end granular customisation.
- 10,000 minutes free every month.
- No credit card required.
LOVED BY DEVELOPERS AT
Experiencing challenges with WebRTC? Fix all with Video SDK
Super Fast Implementation
Prebuilt templates for creating virtual events and classrooms, as well as adding video calling to your platform in 10 minutes.
Reduce Development Effort
Custom video tracks, optimised mode for text and motion, preconfigured templates, and code examples save development efforts by 100x.
Optimized For Best Call Quality
Low-latency across the globe with high bitrate audio and video streams.
Features comparison: WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|
No. of participants (Including hosts) | ✕ 2-3 participants only | ✓ Up to millions of viewers |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ Complex | ✓ Avg. integration takes only 2 weeks |
Adpative audio/video quality | ✓ Available | ✓ Available |
Works behind the Firewall, Private Network | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Webhooks | ✓ Yes | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | NA | ✓ Usage based |
Interactive Live Streaming | NA | ✓ Yes |
Cloud Recording | NA | ✓ Yes |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Multi-platform | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ Very limited | ✓ Up to 5,000 |
Mobile browser support | ✕ 20% | ✓ 90% |
Automatic audio / video degrade, re-connectivity | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for building specific features such as collaborative games, polls etc | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API to build social features such as merging rooms, battles, coins, gifts sending etc | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD recording | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Open source templates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Full Custom roles | ✕ Limited | ✓ Yes |
HLS Streaming | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Cost-effective | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Prebuilt SDK | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Fully customizable UI | ✕ Yes, but requires much efforts | ✓ Yes |
Metaverse platform support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Session analytics | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Data Tracks | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
features | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|
No. of participants (Including hosts) | ✕ 2-3 participants only | ✓ Up to millions of viewers |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ Complex | ✓ Avg. integration takes only 2 weeks |
Adpative audio/video quality | ✓ Available | ✓ Available |
Works behind the Firewall, Private Network | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Webhooks | ✓ Yes | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | NA | ✓ Usage based |
Interactive Live Streaming | NA | ✓ Yes |
Cloud Recording | NA | ✓ Yes |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Multi-platform | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ Very limited | ✓ Up to 5,000 |
Mobile browser support | ✕ 20% | ✓ 90% |
Automatic audio / video degrade, re-connectivity | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for building specific features such as collaborative games, polls etc | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API to build social features such as merging rooms, battles, coins, gifts sending etc | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD recording | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Open source templates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Full Custom roles | ✕ Limited | ✓ Yes |
HLS Streaming | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Cost-effective | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Prebuilt SDK | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Fully customizable UI | ✕ Yes, but requires much efforts | ✓ Yes |
Metaverse platform support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Session analytics | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Data Tracks | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Cost comparison: WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | NA | ✓ Yes |
Video Conferencing | NA |
|
Analytics | NA | ✓ Free |
Separate pricing for video and audio | NA | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 minutes every month | NA | ✓ Yes |
Minimum price for video calls | NA | $0.002 per participant minute |
Minimum price for audio-only calls | NA | $0.0006 per participant min |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ No | ✓ Free |
Cloud recording pricing | NA |
|
RTMP pricing | NA |
|
ILS pricing | NA |
|
Storage pricing | NA |
|
features | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | NA | ✓ Yes |
Video Conferencing | NA |
|
Analytics | NA | ✓ Free |
Separate pricing for video and audio | NA | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 minutes every month | NA | ✓ Yes |
Minimum price for video calls | NA | $0.002 per participant minute |
Minimum price for audio-only calls | NA | $0.0006 per participant min |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ No | ✓ Free |
Cloud recording pricing | NA |
|
RTMP pricing | NA |
|
ILS pricing | NA |
|
Storage pricing | NA |
|
Support comparison: WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|
Support | NA | ✓ Yes |
Cost | NA | Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ No | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK. |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ No | ✓ Inexpensive SLA with 99.9% uptime |
features | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|
Support | NA | ✓ Yes |
Cost | NA | Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ No | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK. |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ No | ✓ Inexpensive SLA with 99.9% uptime |
See why customers love Video SDK
“I still remember when I was trying out the product and connected over discord with Arjun Kava, and he immediately responded. It is one of the things that we found less often. The team is super enthusiastic to make the product as next big thing. Easy integration is the beauty of it. Few lines of code and it's done.”
Ankur Chandra ,
Engineering Manager at Fynd
FAQ
