WebRTC vs Ant Media
A head-to-head comparison of WebRTC and Ant Media, And what features does Video SDK offer?
WebRTC
is a free and open-source initiative that empowers web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities through straightforward JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been finely tuned to effectively fulfill this objective.
Ant Media is an open-source, enterprise-grade live streaming platform that enables businesses and organizations to broadcast live video content to their audiences at scale. It offers a wide range of features, including live video encoding, transcoding, recording, and distribution.
How Video SDK make a difference?
WebRTC and Ant Media are both facilitate real-time communication. WebRTC is the ideal choice, if primary focus within web browsers, offering simplicity, security, and low latency. If the project centers on multimedia content delivery, especially in the context of live streaming or video-on-demand services, Ant Media excels with its streaming capabilities. However, It's essential to be aware of their limitations.
Introducing Video SDK- a powerful and easy-to-use video conferencing SDK that offers a wide range of features, including chat, polls, breakout rooms, streaming capability, and RTMP out. It is the perfect solution for businesses and organizations of all sizes that need to create high-quality and engaging real-time communication experiences.
Here is a comparison of Video SDK with WebRTC and Ant Media, and understand why Video SDK is a much better choice for all your needs.
Features comparison : WebRTC vs Ant Media vs Video SDK
features | WebRTC | Ant Media Server | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
No. of participants (Including hosts) | ✕ WebRTC supports 2-3 participants only. | ✕ 6 Participants Only | ✓ VideoSDK supports millions participants. |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ WebRTC SDK is Complex for integration. | ✕ Complex Integration | ✓ VideoSDK generally requires more than 2 weeks for SDK integration . |
Adpative audio/video quality | ✓ WebRTC offers adaptive audio/video quality | ✓ Available | ✓ VideoSDK offers adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall, Private Network | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ WebRTC has limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✕ No | ✕ Partial Available | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ No | ✓ Available | ✓ In VideoSDK no needed manual configuration. |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✕ In WebRTC collaborative features is not available. | ✓ Available | ✓ Collaborative features available VideoSDK. |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ No | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Easy integration |
Webhooks | ✓ Yes | ✓ Available | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | NA | License Based | ✓ Usage based Price |
Interactive Live Streaming | NA | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports interactive live streaming . |
Cloud Recording | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offers cloud recording capabilities. |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✕ WebRTC not provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK provides an interactive whiteboard feature. |
Multi-platform | ✓ WebRTC supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ WebRTC support limited Interactive Participants. | ✕ Upto 200 | ✓ Up to 5,000 |
Mobile browser support | ✕ 20% | ✕ Limited (30%) | ✓ Video support only 90% mobile browsers. |
Automatic audio / video degrade, re-connectivity | ✓ WebRTC supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✓ WebRTC is dependent on open source. | ✕ No | ✕ VideoSDK is not dependent on open source. |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for building specific features such as collaborative games, polls etc | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
API to build social features such as merging rooms, battles, coins, gifts sending etc | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD recording | ✕ WebRTC not supports full HD recording. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports full HD recording. |
Open source templates | ✓ WebRTC heavily rely on open source templates. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK heavily rely on open source templates. |
Full Custom roles | ✕ Limited | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer support for full custom roles. |
HLS Streaming | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports HLS streaming. |
Cost-effective | ✓ WebRTC is cost effective. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK is cost effective. |
Prebuilt SDK | ✕ WebRTC not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | Separate SDK | ✓ VideoSDK provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. |
Fully customizable UI | ✕ Yes, but requires much efforts | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK allows for a Limited customizable UI. |
Metaverse platform support | ✓ WebRTC support Metaverse platform. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK support Metaverse platform. |
Legacy Solution | ✓ Yes | ✓ No | |
Session analytics | ✕ WebRTC not offer session analytics option. | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer session analytics option. |
Data Tracks | ✕ WebRTC not offer track data option. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer track data option. |
features | WebRTC | Ant Media Server | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
No. of participants (Including hosts) | ✕ WebRTC supports 2-3 participants only. | ✕ 6 Participants Only | ✓ VideoSDK supports millions participants. |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ WebRTC SDK is Complex for integration. | ✕ Complex Integration | ✓ VideoSDK generally requires more than 2 weeks for SDK integration . |
Adpative audio/video quality | ✓ WebRTC offers adaptive audio/video quality | ✓ Available | ✓ VideoSDK offers adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall, Private Network | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ WebRTC has limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✕ No | ✕ Partial Available | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ No | ✓ Available | ✓ In VideoSDK no needed manual configuration. |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✕ In WebRTC collaborative features is not available. | ✓ Available | ✓ Collaborative features available VideoSDK. |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ No | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Easy integration |
Webhooks | ✓ Yes | ✓ Available | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | NA | License Based | ✓ Usage based Price |
Interactive Live Streaming | NA | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports interactive live streaming . |
Cloud Recording | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offers cloud recording capabilities. |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✕ WebRTC not provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK provides an interactive whiteboard feature. |
Multi-platform | ✓ WebRTC supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ WebRTC support limited Interactive Participants. | ✕ Upto 200 | ✓ Up to 5,000 |
Mobile browser support | ✕ 20% | ✕ Limited (30%) | ✓ Video support only 90% mobile browsers. |
Automatic audio / video degrade, re-connectivity | ✓ WebRTC supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✓ WebRTC is dependent on open source. | ✕ No | ✕ VideoSDK is not dependent on open source. |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for building specific features such as collaborative games, polls etc | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
API to build social features such as merging rooms, battles, coins, gifts sending etc | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD recording | ✕ WebRTC not supports full HD recording. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports full HD recording. |
Open source templates | ✓ WebRTC heavily rely on open source templates. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK heavily rely on open source templates. |
Full Custom roles | ✕ Limited | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer support for full custom roles. |
HLS Streaming | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports HLS streaming. |
Cost-effective | ✓ WebRTC is cost effective. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK is cost effective. |
Prebuilt SDK | ✕ WebRTC not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | Separate SDK | ✓ VideoSDK provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. |
Fully customizable UI | ✕ Yes, but requires much efforts | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK allows for a Limited customizable UI. |
Metaverse platform support | ✓ WebRTC support Metaverse platform. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK support Metaverse platform. |
Legacy Solution | ✓ Yes | ✓ No | |
Session analytics | ✕ WebRTC not offer session analytics option. | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer session analytics option. |
Data Tracks | ✕ WebRTC not offer track data option. | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer track data option. |
Price Comparison : WebRTC vs Ant Media vs Video SDK
features | WebRTC | Ant Media Server | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer the volume discount . |
Video Conferencing | NA |
|
|
Analytics | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer free analytics. |
Separate pricing for video and audio | NA | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 minutes every month | NA | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Minimum price for video calls | NA | Ranging from $99 to $2,499 | $0.002 per participant minute |
Minimum price for audio-only calls | NA | Ranging from $99 to $2,499 | $0.0006 per participant min |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer free firewall control. |
Compliance & Privacy | ✕ WebRTC not provides compliance & privacy support. | ✕ Ant Media Server provides robust support for GDPR compliance. | ✓ Secure real-time audio-video to your app or website with compliance and privacy.
|
Cloud recording pricing | NA | Hourly License: $0.09 per instance per hour
Annual License (Self-Hosted): $69.00 per month |
|
RTMP pricing | NA | Hourly License: $0.09 per instance per hour
Annual License (Self-Hosted): $69.00 per month |
|
ILS pricing | NA | Hourly License: $0.09 per instance per hour
Annual License (Self-Hosted): $69.00 per month
Perpetual License (Self-Hosted): $1999.00 |
|
Storage pricing | NA |
|
|
features | WebRTC | Ant Media Server | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer the volume discount . |
Video Conferencing | NA |
|
|
Analytics | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer free analytics. |
Separate pricing for video and audio | NA | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 minutes every month | NA | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Minimum price for video calls | NA | Ranging from $99 to $2,499 | $0.002 per participant minute |
Minimum price for audio-only calls | NA | Ranging from $99 to $2,499 | $0.0006 per participant min |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer free firewall control. |
Compliance & Privacy | ✕ WebRTC not provides compliance & privacy support. | ✕ Ant Media Server provides robust support for GDPR compliance. | ✓ Secure real-time audio-video to your app or website with compliance and privacy.
|
Cloud recording pricing | NA | Hourly License: $0.09 per instance per hour
Annual License (Self-Hosted): $69.00 per month |
|
RTMP pricing | NA | Hourly License: $0.09 per instance per hour
Annual License (Self-Hosted): $69.00 per month |
|
ILS pricing | NA | Hourly License: $0.09 per instance per hour
Annual License (Self-Hosted): $69.00 per month
Perpetual License (Self-Hosted): $1999.00 |
|
Storage pricing | NA |
|
|
Support Comparison : WebRTC vs Ant Media vs Video SDK
features | WebRTC | Ant Media Server | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Support | NA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Cost | NA |
Ant Media Server also offers three pricing editions:
| Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK. |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ No | ✓ Yes (Enterprise Plan) | ✓ Inexpensive SLA with 99.9% uptime |
features | WebRTC | Ant Media Server | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Support | NA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Cost | NA |
Ant Media Server also offers three pricing editions:
| Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK. |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ No | ✓ Yes (Enterprise Plan) | ✓ Inexpensive SLA with 99.9% uptime |
Discover why Video SDK is the top choice for customers
“We switched from a major international player to Video SDK due to their responsiveness to feedback, superior product, and better service. They outshine bigger players in the market and have been excellent in resolving issues promptly.”
Shilpa Jain ,
CEO & Co-Founder at Talk Your Heart Out
FAQ
