Twilio vs Vonage
How do Twilio and Vonage compare? And what does Video SDK offer?
Twilio
originally started by helping developers automate traditional phone calls and SMS text messages. But today, developers can use it to build business communication ( in-app and otherwise) across the customer journey.Vonage
Video API, formerly known as TokBox, empowers developers to craft personalized video experiences for their web, mobile, or desktop applications. With this API, developers can seamlessly integrate video communication features, offering users a unique and immersive video experience within their respective apps.How Video SDK make a difference
Both Twilio and Vonage are prominent live video platforms, each offering its own packages, features, and benefits. However, they fall under the category of legacy video SDK providers, with user experiences remaining unchanged for over half a decade and requiring integration that can take several months into your application.
Video SDK stands out in this landscape. It provides comprehensive video/voice calls, live streams, and collaborative features, all of which can be effortlessly integrated into your app in as little as 10 minutes.
This page compares Vonage and Twilio, and it explains why Video SDK is worthy of your consideration. By reviewing this information, you can make an informed decision and opt for a platform that provides modern solutions and easy integration for your video needs.
Features comparison : Twilio vs Vonage vs Video SDK
features | Twilio | Vonage | Video SDK |
---|---|---|---|
No. of participants (Including hosts) | ✕ Twilio not supports more than 50 participants. | ✕ Vonage supports limited participants. | ✓ VideoSDK supports millions participants. |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ In Twilio High coding effort required. | ✕ Vonage requires high coding effort. | ✓ VideoSDK generally requires more than 2 weeks for SDK integration . |
Adpative audio/video quality | ✕ Twilio not offers adaptive audio/video quality. | ✕ Vonage has limited adaptive audio/video quality. | ✓ VideoSDK offers adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall, Private Network | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ Twilio offer limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | ✕ Vonage has limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | ✓ VideoSDK offer Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✕ Not available | ✕ Not available | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ Twilio needed manual configuration. | ✕ Not available | ✓ In VideoSDK no needed manual configuration. |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✕ Not available or Separate SDK | ✕ In Vonage collaborative features is not available. | ✓ Collaborative features available VideoSDK. |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ Complex integration | ✕ Not available | ✓ Easy integration |
Webhooks | ✕ Only for recording states | ✕ Available but not for everything | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | ✓ Usage based | ✓ Usage based | ✓ Usage based Price |
Interactive Live Streaming | ✕ Twilio supports interactive live streaming. | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports interactive live streaming . |
Cloud Recording | ✓ Twilio offers cloud recording capabilities. | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offers cloud recording capabilities. |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✕ Not available or Separate SDK | ✕ Vonage not provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | ✓ VideoSDK provides an interactive whiteboard feature. |
Multi-platform | ✓ Twilio supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | ✕ Vonage not supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | ✓ VideoSDK supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ Limited support | ✕ Vonage not support Interactive Participants. | ✓ Up to 5,000 |
Mobile browser support | ✕ Twilio offers limited support for mobile browsers. | ✕ Limited | ✓ Video support only 90% mobile browsers. |
Automatic audio / video degrade, re-connectivity | ✕ Twilio not supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments. | ✕ Vonage not supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. | ✓ VideoSDK supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✕ Twilio does not heavily rely on open source templates. | ✕ Vonage is not dependent on open source. | ✕ VideoSDK is not dependent on open source. |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for building specific features such as collaborative games, polls etc | ✕ Limited | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API to build social features such as merging rooms, battles, coins, gifts sending etc | ✕ Limited | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD recording | ✓ Twilio supports full HD recording. | ✓ Vonage supports full HD recording. | ✓ VideoSDK supports full HD recording. |
Open source templates | ✕ Twilio not heavily rely on open source templates. | ✕ Vonage not rely on open source templates. | ✓ VideoSDK heavily rely on open source templates. |
Full Custom roles | ✕ Twilio offer limited support for custom roles. | ✕ Vonage has limited custom roles. | ✓ VideoSDK offer support for full custom roles. |
HLS Streaming | ✕ Twilio not supports HLS streaming. | ✓ Vonage supports HLS streaming. | ✓ VideoSDK supports HLS streaming. |
Cost-effective | ✕ Twilio is not cost effective. | ✕ Vonage is not cost effective. | ✓ VideoSDK is cost effective. |
Prebuilt SDK | ✕ Twilio not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | ✕ Vonage not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | ✓ VideoSDK provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. |
Fully customizable UI | ✕ Twilio not allows for a Limited customizable UI. | ✕ Vonage has Limited customizable UI. | ✓ VideoSDK allows for a Limited customizable UI. |
Metaverse platform support | ✕ Twilio not support Metaverse platform. | ✕ Limited | ✓ VideoSDK support Metaverse platform. |
Session analytics | ✕ Separate charges | ✕ Vonage has Paid Analytics. | ✓ VideoSDK offer session analytics option. |
Data Tracks | ✕ Twillio separate charges for data tracks. | ✕ Vonage offer Data Tracks option but it Paid. | ✓ VideoSDK offer track data option. |
Cost comparison : Twilio vs Vonage vs Video SDK
features | Twilio | Vonage | Video SDK |
---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | ✕ Twilio not offer the volume discount. | ✕ Available, but limited | ✓ VideoSDK offer the volume discount . |
Video Conferencing |
|
|
|
Analytics | ✕ Separate charges | ✕ Paid | ✓ VideoSDK offer free analytics. |
Separate pricing for video and audio | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 minutes every month | ✕ Twilio not offer free 10,000 minutes every month. | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Minimum price for video calls | $0.004 per participant minute | $0.00395 per participant minute | $0.002 per participant minute |
Minimum price for audio-only calls | $0.004 per participant per minute | $0.0017 per participant minute | $0.0006 per participant min |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ No | ✕ Paid | ✓ VideoSDK offer free firewall control. |
Compliance & Privacy | ✕ Twilio provides robust support for GDPR & HIPAA compliance, although it comes with associated charges. | ✕ Vonage Video provides robust support for Only GDPR but it may be Paid. | ✓ Secure real-time audio-video to your app or website with compliance and privacy.
|
Cloud recording pricing |
|
|
|
RTMP pricing | NA |
|
|
ILS pricing | NA |
|
|
Storage pricing |
|
|
|
Support comparison : Twilio vs Vonage vs Video SDK
features | Twilio | Vonage | Video SDK |
---|---|---|---|
Support | ✕ Paid | ✕ Paid | ✓ Yes |
Cost |
| Plans greater than $5500 | Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ No explicit support for testing, quality measurements and reports. | ✕ Only paid accounts | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK. |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ No | ✕ Multiple tiers plan | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ No | ✕ Multiple tiers plan | ✓ Inexpensive SLA with 99.9% uptime |
See why customers love Video SDK
“I still remember when I was trying out the product and connected over discord with Arjun Kava, and he immediately responded. It is one of the things that we found less often. The team is super enthusiastic to make the product as next big thing. Easy integration is the beauty of it. Few lines of code and it's done.”
Ankur Chandra ,
Engineering Manager at Fynd
FAQ