End of Life for Twilio Programmable Video - Upgrade to VideoSDKLearn More

Twilio vs Dyte

A point to point comparison between Twilio and Dyte. And expose features and value offer by VideoSDK.


Twilio originally started by helping developers automate traditional phone calls and SMS text messages. But today, developers can use it to build business communication ( in-app and otherwise) across the customer journey.


Dyte provides a real-time video conferencing SDK that facilitates seamless integration of customized, secured, high-quality live video and voice into your web, mobile, and desktop applications and websites with minimal code.

How VideoSDK make a difference

Twilio and Dyte, a dynamic video conferencing platform, that offer users a reliable and scalable platform for virtual collaboration. Twilio, a cloud communications platform, empowers developers to integrate messaging, voice, and video capabilities seamlessly into applications. Dyte, on the other hand, specializes in real-time video communications, offering a scalable and customizable platform for businesses. Twilio and Dyte enhance user experiences by delivering robust, reliable, and innovative communication solutions.

VideoSDK is a premier provider of real-time audio-video SDKs, delivering comprehensive flexibility, scalability, and control. Our solution streamlines the integration of audio-video conferencing and live streaming seamlessly into both web and mobile applications, ensuring a user-friendly experience.

In this comparative analysis, we'll delve into the strengths and weaknesses of both Twilio and Dyte, offering you valuable insights to enable a discerning decision-making process. By gaining an in-depth understanding of their individual capabilities, you'll be well-equipped to make an informed choice based on your your specific needs and preferences.

Features Comparison : Twilio vs Dyte vs VideoSDK

Explore the distinct features of Twilio, Dyte, and VideoSDK in this comparative analysis, aiding your decision-making for optimal communication solutions.

Video SDK

No. of participants (Including hosts)

Twilio not supports more than 50 participants.

Dyte SDK supports limited participants.

VideoSDK supports millions participants.

Ease of SDK Integration

In Twilio High coding effort required.

Dyte SDK easy to integrate but it take more time.

VideoSDK generally requires more than 2 weeks for SDK integration.

Adpative audio/video quality

Twilio not offers adaptive audio/video quality.

Dyte SDK not offers adaptive audio/video quality.

VideoSDK offers adaptive audio/video quality.

Works behind the Firewall, Private Network




Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates

Twilio offer limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates.

Dyte offer custom roles that are specific to your use-case.

VideoSDK offer Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates.

Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency

Not available

Not Available


Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming

Twilio needed manual configuration.

Not available

In VideoSDK no needed manual configuration.

Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc.

Not available or Separate SDK

In Dyte collaborative features is available.

Collaborative features available VideoSDK.

Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware

Complex integration

Complex Integration.

Easy integration


Only for recording states



Pricing Model

Usage based

Usage based

Usage based Price

Interactive Live Streaming

Twilio supports interactive live streaming.

Dyte support Interactive Live Streaming

VideoSDK supports interactive live streaming.

Cloud Recording

Twilio offers cloud recording capabilities.

VideoSDK offers cloud recording capabilities.

VideoSDK offers cloud recording capabilities.

Interactive Whiteboard

Not available or Separate SDK

Dyte provides an interactive whiteboard feature.

VideoSDK provides an interactive whiteboard feature.

Price Comparison : Twilio vs Dyte vs VideoSDK

Compare pricing structures effortlessly between Twilio, Dyte, and VideoSDK to find the best value for your communication and collaboration needs.

Video SDK

Volume Discount

Twilio not offer the volume discount.

Dyte not offer the volume discount.

VideoSDK offer the volume discount.

Video Conferencing

  • $4 per participant per 1000 minutes

Dyte Charge $4 per minute for HD only.

  • Video SD: $2.00
  • Video HD: $3.00
  • Video Full HD: $7.00
  • Video 2K: $7.00
  • Video 2K+: $7.00


Separate charges

Dyte offer free analytics.

VideoSDK offer free analytics.

Compliance & Privacy

Twilio provides robust support for GDPR & HIPAA compliance, although it comes with associated charges.

Dyte provides robust support only HIPPA compliance but it take charge $200/month.

Secure real-time audio-video to your app or website with compliance and privacy.

  1. HIPPA Complaint
  2. GDPR Complaint
  3. Data Localization
  4. SOC 2 Type 2
  5. VAPT(Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing,)
  6. CERT-in (Indian Computer Emergency Response Team )

Cloud recording pricing

  • $0.004/user/minute + $0.01/minute composition charges

Dyte cloud recording pricing is: Video HD: $10.00 1,000 minutes

  • Video SD: $15.00 1,000 minutes, No limit on participants
  • Video HD: $15.00 1,000 minutes,No limit on participants

RTMP pricing


Dyte RTMP pricing is $15 per 1,000 minutes

  • $15 per 1,000 minutes

ILS pricing


Aggregated resolution based per participant pricing

  • $0.001 per participant minute (Also supports Full HD)

Storage pricing

  • $0.05/GB/month for additional storage

Extra cost

  • $3 per 1000 minutes per month

Support Comparison : Twilio vs Dyte vs VideoSDK

Video SDK






  • Production plan: Greater of 4% of monthly spend or $250
  • Business plan: Greater of 6% of monthly spend or $1,500
  • Personalized plan: Greater of 8% of monthly spend or $5,000



Access to Testing

No explicit support for testing, quality measurements and reports.


All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK.

Access to TAM / CS Engineer



Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers




Inexpensive SLA with 99.9% uptime


How MomentoStream increased user engagement into their live streaming platform with Video SDK

Have any business query?


Let’s build together