End of Life for Twilio Programmable Video - Upgrade to VideoSDKLearn More

WebSocket vs SSE: Comprehensive Comparison, Use Cases, and Implementation Guide

Discover the key differences between WebSocket and Server-Sent Events (SSE) in this comprehensive guide. Learn about step-by-step implementation with code examples.


In today's fast-paced digital world, real-time communication has become an essential feature for many web applications. Whether it's live chat, notifications, or dynamic data updates, users expect immediate and seamless interactions. Two prominent technologies that enable real-time communication in web development are WebSocket and Server-Sent Events (SSE).
Both of these technologies facilitate live data exchange between a client and a server, but they do so in different ways and are suited for different types of applications. Understanding the distinctions between WebSocket and SSE is crucial for developers to make informed decisions based on their specific use cases and requirements.

Understanding WebSocket and SSE

What is WebSocket?

WebSocket is a protocol that provides full-duplex communication channels over a single TCP connection. It enables bidirectional communication between a client and a server, allowing data to be sent and received simultaneously. This makes WebSocket ideal for applications that require real-time updates, such as online gaming, financial tickers, and live chat applications.

What is Server-Sent Events (SSE)?

Server-Sent Events (SSE) is a unidirectional protocol where updates flow from the server to the client. SSE is built on top of the HTTP protocol and uses a simple event-driven model to push updates from the server to the client. This makes SSE suitable for applications like live news feeds, social media updates, and any scenario where the client needs to receive continuous data streams from the server without sending much data back.

Technical Differences of WebSocket and SSE

WebSocket and SSE differ significantly in their technical architectures:


  • Establishes a persistent, full-duplex connection.
  • Uses a single TCP connection for both client-server and server-client communication.
  • Requires a specific WebSocket server to handle connections.
  • More complex to implement and maintain due to the need for handling the connection lifecycle.


  • Operates over a standard HTTP connection.
  • Unidirectional communication where data is sent from the server to the client.
  • Simpler to implement as it uses regular HTTP protocols.
  • Automatically handles reconnections and event ID tracking for reliability.
These differences affect their suitability for various applications and their implementation complexities.

Pros and Cons of WebSocket and SSE

WebSocket Pros

  • Supports bidirectional communication.
  • Low latency, suitable for real-time applications.
  • Efficient use of a single connection for both directions.

WebSocket Cons

  • More complex to set up and maintain.
  • Requires a specialized WebSocket server.
  • Firewall and proxy compatibility issues can arise.

SSE Pros

  • Simple to implement using standard HTTP.
  • Built-in reconnection and event ID tracking.
  • Works well with existing HTTP infrastructure and is firewall-friendly.

SSE Cons

  • Unidirectional; only supports server-to-client communication.
  • Can have higher latency compared to WebSocket for certain applications.
  • Not suitable for applications requiring frequent client-to-server interactions.

Use Cases and Applications of WebSocket and SSE

WebSocket Use Cases

  • Online Gaming: Real-time interactions and low latency are crucial.
  • Live Chat Applications: Bi-directional communication enables seamless messaging.
  • Collaborative Editing: Real-time document updates with minimal delay.

SSE Use Cases

  • Live News Feeds: Continuous updates from the server without frequent client requests.
  • Social Media Feeds: Streaming updates and notifications to users.
  • Monitoring Dashboards: Real-time data visualization where updates are pushed from the server.
Choosing between WebSocket and SSE depends on the specific requirements of the application, including the need for bidirectional communication and the complexity of implementation.

Performance and Scalability of WebSocket and SSE


  • WebSocket: Typically offers lower latency due to its persistent connection, making it ideal for applications requiring fast, real-time interactions.
  • SSE: While it has slightly higher latency due to the HTTP overhead, it is generally sufficient for most applications that require server-to-client updates.


  • WebSocket: Requires a WebSocket server capable of handling a large number of simultaneous connections, which can be resource-intensive.
  • SSE: Utilizes standard HTTP servers, making it easier to scale using existing HTTP infrastructure. The server load is generally lower since it only handles outgoing messages.
The choice between WebSocket and SSE often comes down to balancing the performance needs with the scalability requirements of the application.

Security Considerations of WebSocket and SSE


  • Requires explicit handling of security concerns like Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking.
  • Needs secure WebSocket (wss) for encrypted communication to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.
  • Must manage authentication and authorization at the application level.


  • Utilizes standard HTTP security mechanisms, such as HTTPS, to secure data in transit.
  • Automatically benefits from HTTP authentication and authorization methods.
  • Simpler to secure due to its reliance on established HTTP protocols.
Both technologies must be implemented with proper security measures to ensure the protection of data and prevent unauthorized access.

Implementation Guide of WebSocket and SSE

Setting Up a WebSocket Connection

Server-Side (Node.js Example)


1   const WebSocket = require('ws');
2   const wss = new WebSocket.Server({ port: 8080 });
4   wss.on('connection', ws => {
5     ws.on('message', message => {
6       console.log(`Received message => ${message}`);
7     });
8     ws.send('Hello! Message From Server!!');
9   });



1   const socket = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:8080');
3   socket.onopen = () => {
4     console.log('Connected');
5     socket.send('Hello Server!');
6   };
8   socket.onmessage = event => {
9     console.log(`Message from server: ${event.data}`);
10   };

Setting Up an SSE Connection

Server-Side (Node.js Example)


1   const http = require('http');
3   http.createServer((req, res) => {
4     res.writeHead(200, {
5       'Content-Type': 'text/event-stream',
6       'Cache-Control': 'no-cache',
7       'Connection': 'keep-alive'
8     });
10     setInterval(() => {
11       res.write(`data: ${new Date().toISOString()}\n\n`);
12     }, 1000);
13   }).listen(8080);



1   const eventSource = new EventSource('http://localhost:8080');
3   eventSource.onmessage = event => {
4     console.log(`New message: ${event.data}`);
5   };

Get Free 10,000 Minutes Every Months

No credit card required to start.

Integration with Existing Systems

Integrating WebSocket

  • Ensure the WebSocket server can handle the existing load and integrates well with your application architecture.
  • Use libraries like socket.io to simplify the implementation and provide additional features.

Integrating SSE

  • Leverage existing HTTP infrastructure to implement SSE.
  • Use frameworks like Express.js for easy setup and management of SSE endpoints.
Both technologies can be integrated into existing systems with careful planning and consideration of their specific requirements and constraints. This allows for seamless real-time communication in web applications.


In summary, both WebSocket and Server-Sent Events (SSE) are powerful technologies for real-time web communication. WebSocket is ideal for applications requiring bidirectional communication and low latency, while SSE is simpler to implement and perfect for unidirectional data streams. Choosing the right technology depends on your specific use case and requirements.

Want to level-up your learning? Subscribe now

Subscribe to our newsletter for more tech based insights