BigBlueButton vs Ant Media
A head-to-head comparison of BigBlueButton vs Ant Media, And what features does Video SDK offer?
BigBlueButton is a free and open-source web conferencing system that allows users to host and join video conferences, online meetings, and virtual classrooms. It is a popular choice for educational institutions and businesses, as it offers a wide range of features.
Ant Media is an open-source, enterprise-grade live streaming platform that enables businesses and organizations to broadcast live video content to their audiences at scale. It offers a wide range of features, including live video encoding, transcoding, recording, and distribution.
How Video SDK make a difference?
BigBlueButton and Ant Media are both software solutions used in the field of real-time communication and media streaming. BigBlueButton is designed for online learning and virtual classrooms, while Ant Media offers a media server and streaming platform designed for live streaming, video on demand (VOD). However, there are some key differences beetween comparison of BigBlueButton and Ant Media so it's essential to be aware of their limitations and constraints.
Presenting the Video SDK - a robust and user-friendly video conferencing SDK that offers an extensive array of features, including chat, polls, break-out rooms, streaming capabilities, and RTMP out. It's the perfect solution for businesses and organizations of any size that require creating top-notch and captivating real-time communication experiences.
Here is a comparison of Video SDK with BigBlueButton vs Ant Media, and understand why Video SDK emerges as a much better choice for all your requirements.
Features Comparison : BigBlueButton vs Ant Media vs Video SDK
features | BigBlueButton | Ant Media Server | Video SDK |
---|---|---|---|
No. of participants (Including hosts) | ✕ Upto 100 Participants Only | ✕ 6 Participants Only | ✓ VideoSDK supports millions participants. |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ Complex Integration | ✕ Complex Integration | ✓ VideoSDK generally requires more than 2 weeks for SDK integration . |
Adpative audio/video quality | ✓ Available | ✓ Available | ✓ VideoSDK offers adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall, Private Network | ✕ 3rd Party Deployment | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✕ Not Available | ✕ Partial Available | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Available | ✓ In VideoSDK no needed manual configuration. |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✓ Available | ✓ Available | ✓ Collaborative features available VideoSDK. |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ Not Available | ✕ Not Available | ✓ Easy integration |
Webhooks | ✓ Available | ✓ Available | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | Monthly Price | License Based | ✓ Usage based Price |
Interactive Live Streaming | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports interactive live streaming . |
Cloud Recording | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offers cloud recording capabilities. |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK provides an interactive whiteboard feature. |
Multi-platform | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ Upto 100 | ✕ Upto 200 | ✓ Up to 5,000 |
Mobile browser support | ✕ Limited | ✕ Limited (30%) | ✓ Video support only 90% mobile browsers. |
Automatic audio / video degrade, re-connectivity | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✕ VideoSDK is not dependent on open source. |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for building specific features such as collaborative games, polls etc | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
API to build social features such as merging rooms, battles, coins, gifts sending etc | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD recording | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK supports full HD recording. |
Open source templates | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK heavily rely on open source templates. |
Full Custom roles | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer support for full custom roles. |
HLS Streaming | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports HLS streaming. |
Cost-effective | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK is cost effective. |
Prebuilt SDK | ✕ Separate SDK | Separate SDK | ✓ VideoSDK provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. |
Fully customizable UI | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK allows for a Limited customizable UI. |
Metaverse platform support | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK support Metaverse platform. |
Session analytics | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer session analytics option. |
Data Tracks | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer track data option. |
Price Comparison : BigBlueButton vs Ant Media vs Video SDK
features | BigBlueButton | Ant Media Server | Video SDK |
---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer the volume discount . |
Video Conferencing |
|
|
|
Analytics | NA | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer free analytics. |
Separate pricing for video and audio | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 minutes every month | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Minimum price for video calls | Pro plan starts at $149.90 per year per license Additional Pricing (Maximum 25 users per 60 min session):
| Ranging from $99 to $2,499 | $0.002 per participant minute |
Minimum price for audio-only calls | Pro plan starts at $149.90 per year per license Additional Pricing (Maximum 25 users per 60 min session):
| Ranging from $99 to $2,499 | $0.0006 per participant min |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK offer free firewall control. |
Compliance & Privacy | ✕ BigBlueButton not provides compliance & privacy support. | ✕ Ant Media Server provides robust support for GDPR compliance. | ✓ Secure real-time audio-video to your app or website with compliance and privacy.
|
Cloud recording pricing | Recording storage: $19 per TB per month
(for 25 participants on session) | Hourly License: $0.09 per instance per hour
Annual License (Self-Hosted): $69.00 per month |
|
RTMP pricing | $2.5 per GB per month | Hourly License: $0.09 per instance per hour
Annual License (Self-Hosted): $69.00 per month |
|
ILS pricing | $99 per month
(For Maximum 25 users per 60 min session) | Hourly License: $0.09 per instance per hour
Annual License (Self-Hosted): $69.00 per month
Perpetual License (Self-Hosted): $1999.00 |
|
Storage pricing |
|
|
|
Support Comparison : BigBlueButton vs Ant Media vs Video SDK
features | BigBlueButton | Ant Media Server | Video SDK |
---|---|---|---|
Support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Cost | $149/mo |
Ant Media Server also offers three pricing editions:
| Free |
Access to Testing | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK. |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✓ Yes, but Additional.
| ✓ Yes (Enterprise Plan) | ✓ Inexpensive SLA with 99.9% uptime |
Discover why Video SDK is the top choice for customers
![Company Logo Company Logo](/images/customers/judge_logo.png)
“VideoSDK's well-structured product and efficient support team expedited integration. Their excellent user experience and well-defined documentation prompted us to switch from our previous provider.”
Kanishk Agrawal ,
Sr. Director - Technology at Judge Group
FAQ