RTMP vs HLS: Choosing the Best Protocol for Live Streaming

A detailed comparison of RTMP and HLS streaming protocols, covering their strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases for live and on-demand video.

Introduction to RTMP vs HLS

In the world of live video streaming, choosing the right protocol is crucial for delivering a high-quality viewing experience. Two of the most prevalent protocols are RTMP (Real-Time Messaging Protocol) and HLS (HTTP Live Streaming). This article provides a comprehensive comparison to help you determine which protocol best suits your needs.

What is RTMP?

RTMP (Real-Time Messaging Protocol) is a proprietary protocol initially designed for streaming audio, video, and data over the internet, primarily between a Flash player and a server. It excels at low-latency streaming, making it a favorite for interactive applications.

What is HLS?

HLS (HTTP Live Streaming) is an adaptive bitrate streaming protocol developed by Apple. It works by breaking the video stream into a sequence of small HTTP-based file downloads, which are then reassembled by the player. Its key strength lies in its broad compatibility and ability to adapt to varying network conditions.

The Evolution of Streaming Protocols

RTMP was the dominant protocol for live streaming for many years, largely due to the prevalence of the Flash player. However, with the decline of Flash and the rise of mobile devices, HLS has gained significant traction. Modern streaming solutions often leverage a combination of both protocols to cater to diverse needs and devices. Other protocols include MPEG-DASH, WebRTC and SRT.

RTMP: Strengths and Weaknesses

RTMP continues to be relevant, especially for ingestion. However, its limitations regarding browser compatibility and modern security concerns are driving many to adopt newer protocols for delivery.

Advantages of RTMP

  • Low Latency: RTMP is renowned for its low latency, often achieving sub-second delays, which is crucial for real-time applications.
  • Simple Setup (for certain scenarios): Configuring an RTMP server can be relatively straightforward, especially for basic streaming setups. Most encoders support RTMP out of the box.
  • Established Protocol: RTMP has been around for a long time, and there's a wealth of knowledge and tooling available.

RTMP server configuration example

1rtmp {
2    server {
3        listen 1935;
4        chunk_size 4096;
5
6        application live {
7            live on;
8            record off;
9        }
10    }
11}
12

Disadvantages of RTMP

  • Lack of Browser Compatibility (without plugins): RTMP requires a Flash player or a specialized plugin to play in a web browser. This poses a major challenge since most modern browsers no longer support Flash.
  • Security Concerns: RTMP's security features are limited, making it vulnerable to certain types of attacks. While RTMPS (RTMP Secure) exists, it's not as widely supported as HTTPS for HLS.
  • Limited Scalability: Scaling RTMP streams can be more complex and expensive compared to HLS, as it typically requires dedicated servers and load balancing.
  • Dependence on Flash (legacy): The decline of Flash has significantly reduced the viability of RTMP for delivery.

HLS: Strengths and Weaknesses

HLS is the go-to choice for most modern streaming applications due to its compatibility, scalability, and adaptive bitrate capabilities.

Advantages of HLS

  • Wide Browser and Device Compatibility: HLS is natively supported by most modern web browsers, mobile devices (iOS and Android), and smart TVs, ensuring a broad reach.
  • Adaptive Bitrate Streaming: HLS supports adaptive bitrate streaming, which allows the player to switch between different video quality levels based on the user's network conditions. This ensures a smooth viewing experience, even with fluctuating bandwidth.
  • High Scalability: HLS leverages standard HTTP infrastructure, making it highly scalable and easy to distribute via CDNs (Content Delivery Networks).
  • Improved Security Features: HLS supports encryption and authentication, making it more secure than RTMP. Using HTTPS adds another layer of security.

HLS playlist example

1#EXTM3U
2#EXT-X-VERSION:3
3#EXT-X-MEDIA-SEQUENCE:0
4#EXT-X-TARGETDURATION:10
5#EXTINF:10.0,
6segment1.ts
7#EXTINF:10.0,
8segment2.ts
9#EXTINF:10.0,
10segment3.ts
11#EXT-X-ENDLIST
12

Disadvantages of HLS

  • Higher Latency: HLS typically has higher latency compared to RTMP, often ranging from 5 to 45 seconds. This is due to the way HLS segments video into chunks and the buffering required by the player. Although techniques like Low-Latency HLS are helping to reduce this.
  • Complexity in setup and configuration: Setting up an HLS streaming workflow can be more complex than RTMP, especially when dealing with adaptive bitrate encoding and CDN integration.
  • Increased bandwidth requirements (potentially): Because HLS often delivers higher quality video, it can require more bandwidth than older RTMP streams, especially when adaptive bitrate streaming is in use.

RTMP vs HLS: A Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison across key features:

Latency

  • RTMP: Generally offers lower latency, often below 5 seconds, making it suitable for interactive applications.
  • HLS: Typically has higher latency, ranging from 5 to 45 seconds. Low-Latency HLS attempts to address this.

Adaptive Bitrate Streaming

  • RTMP: Does not natively support adaptive bitrate streaming. It requires custom implementations.
  • HLS: Built-in support for adaptive bitrate streaming makes it ideal for delivering high-quality video to users with varying network conditions.

Compatibility

  • RTMP: Limited browser compatibility due to the decline of Flash.
  • HLS: Excellent compatibility across most modern browsers, devices, and operating systems.

Security

  • RTMP: Limited security features, making it more vulnerable to attacks.
  • HLS: Supports encryption and authentication, providing better security for content delivery.

Choosing the Right Protocol for Your Needs

Selecting the right protocol depends on your specific requirements.

Low Latency Requirements

If low latency is paramount, such as for real-time gaming or interactive broadcasts, RTMP (or more likely, a modern low-latency protocol like WebRTC) might be considered for the ingest stage, feeding into a system that then redistributes via HLS or DASH. However, end-to-end RTMP is generally not recommended.

Scalability and Reach

For large-scale events where reaching a broad audience is critical, HLS is the preferred choice due to its wide compatibility and scalability. Its integration with CDNs makes it easy to deliver content to a global audience.

Budget and Infrastructure

The cost of infrastructure can also influence your choice. HLS's HTTP-based nature makes it CDN-friendly, reducing costs. RTMP might require more specialized servers and configurations, potentially increasing expenses.

Real-World Use Cases

Live Gaming and Esports (using RTMP)

RTMP was historically used for live gaming streams due to its low latency, but it's being replaced by more modern protocols like WebRTC and SRT. The low latency requirement is critical for player interaction and real-time feedback.

Large-Scale Live Events (using HLS)

HLS is commonly used for broadcasting large-scale live events, such as concerts, sports games, and conferences. Its scalability and compatibility ensure a smooth viewing experience for a vast audience.

On-demand Video (using HLS)

HLS is also widely used for on-demand video streaming, offering adaptive bitrate streaming and broad device compatibility.

Future of Streaming Protocols

Emerging Technologies and Standards

Protocols like WebRTC and SRT are gaining popularity due to their low latency and open-source nature. Low-Latency HLS is also a promising development.

The Role of CDNs (Content Delivery Networks)

CDNs play a critical role in delivering streaming content efficiently and reliably. They cache content closer to users, reducing latency and improving the overall viewing experience.
Here is a diagram that explains how RTMP and HLS work:
Remember to consider:
  • Understanding Adaptive Bitrate Streaming: Adaptive bitrate streaming is a technique that allows the player to dynamically adjust the video quality based on the user's network conditions.
  • Choosing the Right CDN for Your Live Stream: Selecting a CDN with global coverage and robust infrastructure is crucial for delivering a reliable live streaming experience.
  • Security Best Practices for Live Streaming: Implement security measures like encryption and authentication to protect your content from unauthorized access.

Get 10,000 Free Minutes Every Months

No credit card required to start.

Want to level-up your learning? Subscribe now

Subscribe to our newsletter for more tech based insights

FAQ