100ms vs WebRTC
How do 100ms and WebRTC compare? And what does Video SDK offer?
100ms is a cloud platform that empowers developers to integrate video and audio conferencing into Web, Android, and iOS applications. The platform offers REST APIs, SDKs, and a user-friendly dashboard, making it easy to capture, distribute, record, and display live interactive audio and video content.
WebRTC is a free and open-source initiative that empowers web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities through straightforward JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been finely tuned to effectively fulfill this objective.
How Video SDK make a difference
As you explore the realm of real-time communications, 100ms and WebRTC emerge as intriguing choices. 100ms presents contemporary APIs and collaborative features, while WebRTC stands as a dependable open-source solution.
However, Video SDK introduces a transformative factor. But what makes it stand out? This page conducts a comprehensive comparison between 100ms and WebRTC, unveiling the aspects that contribute to Video SDK's exceptional performance. An ideal solution tailored to meet your specific requirements!
Features comparison : 100ms vs WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | 100ms | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
No. of participants (Including hosts) | ✕ Limited | ✕ 2-3 participants only | ✓ Up to millions of viewers |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ Complex | ✕ Complex | ✓ Avg. integration takes only 2 weeks |
Adpative audio/video quality | ✕ Limited | ✓ Available | ✓ Available |
Works behind the Firewall, Private Network | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ Limited | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ Manual configuration needed | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✕ Not available | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ Not available | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Webhooks | ✕ Available but not for everything | ✓ Yes | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | ✓ Usage based | NA | ✓ Usage based |
Interactive Live Streaming | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Cloud Recording | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Multi-platform | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ Limited | ✕ Very limited | ✓ Up to 5,000 |
Mobile browser support | ✕ 50% | ✕ 20% | ✓ 90% |
Automatic audio / video degrade, re-connectivity | ✕ 720p | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ Partial | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for building specific features such as collaborative games, polls etc | ✕ Partial | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API to build social features such as merging rooms, battles, coins, gifts sending etc | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD recording | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Open source templates | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Full Custom roles | ✕ No | ✕ Limited | ✓ Yes |
HLS Streaming | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Cost-effective | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Prebuilt SDK | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Fully customizable UI | ✕ No | ✕ Yes, but requires much efforts | ✓ Yes |
Metaverse platform support | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Session analytics | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Data Tracks | ✕ Partial | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
features | 100ms | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
No. of participants (Including hosts) | ✕ Limited | ✕ 2-3 participants only | ✓ Up to millions of viewers |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✕ Complex | ✕ Complex | ✓ Avg. integration takes only 2 weeks |
Adpative audio/video quality | ✕ Limited | ✓ Available | ✓ Available |
Works behind the Firewall, Private Network | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ Limited | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✕ Manual configuration needed | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✕ Not available | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✕ Not available | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Webhooks | ✕ Available but not for everything | ✓ Yes | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | ✓ Usage based | NA | ✓ Usage based |
Interactive Live Streaming | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Cloud Recording | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Multi-platform | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ Limited | ✕ Very limited | ✓ Up to 5,000 |
Mobile browser support | ✕ 50% | ✕ 20% | ✓ 90% |
Automatic audio / video degrade, re-connectivity | ✕ 720p | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ Partial | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for building specific features such as collaborative games, polls etc | ✕ Partial | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API to build social features such as merging rooms, battles, coins, gifts sending etc | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD recording | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Open source templates | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Full Custom roles | ✕ No | ✕ Limited | ✓ Yes |
HLS Streaming | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Cost-effective | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Prebuilt SDK | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Fully customizable UI | ✕ No | ✕ Yes, but requires much efforts | ✓ Yes |
Metaverse platform support | ✕ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Session analytics | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Data Tracks | ✕ Partial | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Cost comparison : 100ms vs WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | 100ms | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | ✕ No | NA | ✓ Yes |
Video Conferencing |
| NA |
|
Analytics | ✕ No | NA | ✓ Free |
Separate pricing for video and audio | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 minutes every month | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Minimum price for video calls | $0.004 per participant minute | NA | $0.002 per participant minute |
Minimum price for audio-only calls | $0.001 per participant minute | NA | $0.0006 per participant min |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Free |
Cloud recording pricing |
| NA |
|
RTMP pricing |
| NA |
|
ILS pricing |
| NA |
|
Storage pricing | NA | NA |
|
features | 100ms | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | ✕ No | NA | ✓ Yes |
Video Conferencing |
| NA |
|
Analytics | ✕ No | NA | ✓ Free |
Separate pricing for video and audio | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 minutes every month | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Minimum price for video calls | $0.004 per participant minute | NA | $0.002 per participant minute |
Minimum price for audio-only calls | $0.001 per participant minute | NA | $0.0006 per participant min |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Free |
Cloud recording pricing |
| NA |
|
RTMP pricing |
| NA |
|
ILS pricing |
| NA |
|
Storage pricing | NA | NA |
|
Support comparison : 100ms vs WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | 100ms | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Support | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Cost | Free | NA | Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK. |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Inexpensive SLA with 99.9% uptime |
features | 100ms | WebRTC | Video SDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Support | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Cost | Free | NA | Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK. |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Inexpensive SLA with 99.9% uptime |
See why customers love Video SDK
“VideoSDK's well-structured product and efficient support team expedited integration. Their excellent user experience and well-defined documentation prompted us to switch from our previous provider.”
Kanishk Agrawal ,
Sr. Director - Technology at Judge Group
FAQ
