100ms vs WebRTC
A head-to-head comparison of 100ms and WebRTC, And what features and value does Video SDK offer?
100ms is a platform that provides infrastructure and client-side SDKs for developers to build real-time, interactive audio-video experiences in their apps. It combines the capabilities of video conferencing (built over WebRTC), live streaming (built over HLS), and real-time databases.
WebRTC is a free and open-source initiative that empowers web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities through straightforward JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been finely tuned to effectively fulfill this objective.
How Video SDK make a difference?
As you explore the realm of real-time communications, 100ms and WebRTC emerge as intriguing choices. 100ms presents contemporary APIs and collaborative features, while WebRTC stands as a dependable open-source solution.
However, Video SDK introduces a transformative factor. But what makes it stand out? This page conducts a comprehensive comparison between 100ms and WebRTC, unveiling the aspects that contribute to Video SDK's exceptional performance. An ideal solution tailored to meet your specific requirements!
Features Comparison : 100ms vs WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | 100ms | WebRTC |  VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
No. of Participants (Including Hosts) | ✓ Upto 10,000 participants | ✕ WebRTC supports 2-3 participants only. | ✓ VideoSDK supports upto Million Participants |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✓ Easier integration with pre-built templates and reduced lines of code required | ✕ WebRTC SDK is Complex for integration. | ✓ VideoSDK requires less than 2 weeks for SDK integration |
Adpative Audio/Video Quality | ✓ HD (720p) | ✓ WebRTC offers adaptive audio/video quality | ✓ VideoSDK provides best adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall/Private-Network | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ Limited | ✕ WebRTC has limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | ✓ VideoSDK offers Role management, Permissions, Policy and Templates |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✓ Available, Needs Manual Configuration | ✕ No | ✓ Available (No need for manual config.) |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✓ Available | ✕ In WebRTC collaborative features is not available. | ✓ VideoSDK offers a range of collaborative features |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✓ Available | ✕ No | ✓ Easy Integration |
Webhooks | ✓ Available for Advance Usecases only | ✓ Yes | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | ✓ Pay-as-you-go | NA | ✓ Pay-as-You-Go Plan |
Interactive Live Streaming | ✓ Available | NA | ✓ VideoSDK supports Interactive Live Streaming |
Cloud Recording | ✓ Available | NA | ✓ VideoSDK offers Cloud Recording Capabilities |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✓ Yes | ✕ WebRTC not provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | ✓ VideoSDK provides Interactive Whiteboard Feature |
Multi-platform | ✓ Yes | ✓ WebRTC supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | ✓ VideoSDK compatible with Multi-Platforms for greater reach |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ Limited Support | ✕ WebRTC support limited Interactive Participants. | ✓ Upto 5,000 |
Mobile Browser Support | ✓ Yes (89% Browser Supported) | ✕ 20% | ✓ Video support 91% mobile browsers |
Automatic Audio/Video Degrade, Re-connectivity | ✕ 720p only | ✓ WebRTC supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. | ✓ VideoSDK supports Reconnectivity with Audio/Video Quality adjustments.. |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ Not Available | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✕ No | ✓ WebRTC is dependent on open source. | ✕ VideoSDK is not dependent on open source. |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✓ Available | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for Specific Features (Collaborative Games, Polls, etc.) | ✓ Available | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for Social Features (Merging Rooms, Battles, Coins, Gifts Sending etc.) | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD Recording | ✓ Yes | ✕ WebRTC not supports full HD recording. | ✓ VideoSDK supports full HD recording |
Open Source Templates | ✕ Limited | ✓ WebRTC heavily rely on open source templates. | ✓ VideoSDK rely on open source templates |
Full Custom roles | ✕ Supported | ✕ Limited | ✓ VideoSDK offer support for full custom roles |
HLS Streaming | ✓ Available | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports HLS streaming |
Cost-effective | ✕ Based On Use | ✓ WebRTC is cost effective. | ✓ VideoSDK is Cost Effective |
Prebuilt SDK | ✓ Available | ✕ WebRTC not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | ✓ VideoSDK provides Prebuilt SDKs for easier integration |
Fully Customizable UI | ✓ Yes | ✕ Yes, but requires much efforts | ✓ VideoSDK allows for Limited customizable UI |
Metaverse Platform Support | ✕ No | ✓ WebRTC support Metaverse platform. | ✓ VideoSDK support Metaverse platform |
Session Analytics | ✓ Available | ✕ WebRTC not offer session analytics option. | ✓ VideoSDK offer session analytics option |
Data Tracks | ✕ No | ✕ WebRTC not offer track data option. | ✓ VideoSDK offer track data option |
features | 100ms | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
No. of Participants (Including Hosts) | ✓ Upto 10,000 participants | ✕ WebRTC supports 2-3 participants only. | ✓ VideoSDK supports upto Million Participants |
Ease of SDK Integration | ✓ Easier integration with pre-built templates and reduced lines of code required | ✕ WebRTC SDK is Complex for integration. | ✓ VideoSDK requires less than 2 weeks for SDK integration |
Adpative Audio/Video Quality | ✓ HD (720p) | ✓ WebRTC offers adaptive audio/video quality | ✓ VideoSDK provides best adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall/Private-Network | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | ✕ Limited | ✕ WebRTC has limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | ✓ VideoSDK offers Role management, Permissions, Policy and Templates |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | ✓ Yes | ✕ No | ✓ Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | ✓ Available, Needs Manual Configuration | ✕ No | ✓ Available (No need for manual config.) |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | ✓ Available | ✕ In WebRTC collaborative features is not available. | ✓ VideoSDK offers a range of collaborative features |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | ✓ Available | ✕ No | ✓ Easy Integration |
Webhooks | ✓ Available for Advance Usecases only | ✓ Yes | ✓ Available |
Pricing Model | ✓ Pay-as-you-go | NA | ✓ Pay-as-You-Go Plan |
Interactive Live Streaming | ✓ Available | NA | ✓ VideoSDK supports Interactive Live Streaming |
Cloud Recording | ✓ Available | NA | ✓ VideoSDK offers Cloud Recording Capabilities |
Interactive Whiteboard | ✓ Yes | ✕ WebRTC not provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | ✓ VideoSDK provides Interactive Whiteboard Feature |
Multi-platform | ✓ Yes | ✓ WebRTC supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | ✓ VideoSDK compatible with Multi-Platforms for greater reach |
Interactive Participant Support | ✕ Limited Support | ✕ WebRTC support limited Interactive Participants. | ✓ Upto 5,000 |
Mobile Browser Support | ✓ Yes (89% Browser Supported) | ✕ 20% | ✓ Video support 91% mobile browsers |
Automatic Audio/Video Degrade, Re-connectivity | ✕ 720p only | ✓ WebRTC supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. | ✓ VideoSDK supports Reconnectivity with Audio/Video Quality adjustments.. |
Audio & Video powered by AI | ✕ Not Available | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | ✕ No | ✓ WebRTC is dependent on open source. | ✕ VideoSDK is not dependent on open source. |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | ✓ Available | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for Specific Features (Collaborative Games, Polls, etc.) | ✓ Available | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
API for Social Features (Merging Rooms, Battles, Coins, Gifts Sending etc.) | ✕ No | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
Full HD Recording | ✓ Yes | ✕ WebRTC not supports full HD recording. | ✓ VideoSDK supports full HD recording |
Open Source Templates | ✕ Limited | ✓ WebRTC heavily rely on open source templates. | ✓ VideoSDK rely on open source templates |
Full Custom roles | ✕ Supported | ✕ Limited | ✓ VideoSDK offer support for full custom roles |
HLS Streaming | ✓ Available | ✓ Yes | ✓ VideoSDK supports HLS streaming |
Cost-effective | ✕ Based On Use | ✓ WebRTC is cost effective. | ✓ VideoSDK is Cost Effective |
Prebuilt SDK | ✓ Available | ✕ WebRTC not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | ✓ VideoSDK provides Prebuilt SDKs for easier integration |
Fully Customizable UI | ✓ Yes | ✕ Yes, but requires much efforts | ✓ VideoSDK allows for Limited customizable UI |
Metaverse Platform Support | ✕ No | ✓ WebRTC support Metaverse platform. | ✓ VideoSDK support Metaverse platform |
Session Analytics | ✓ Available | ✕ WebRTC not offer session analytics option. | ✓ VideoSDK offer session analytics option |
Data Tracks | ✕ No | ✕ WebRTC not offer track data option. | ✓ VideoSDK offer track data option |
Price Comparison : 100ms vs WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | 100ms | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | ✕ Available | NA | ✓ VideoSDK offer the Volume Discount |
Video Conferencing | ✓ Yes | NA |
|
Analytics | ✓ Available, starting at $449/month | NA | ✓ VideoSDK offer Free Analytics with Dashboard |
Separate Pricing for Video and Audio | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 Minutes Every Month | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Minimum Price for Video Calls | $4 per 1000 participant minutes | NA | $0.004 per participant minutes |
Minimum Price for Audio-only Calls | $1 per 1000 participant minutes | NA | $0.001 per participant minutes |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ Not specified | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer Free Firewall Control |
Compliance & Privacy | ✕ Support only HIPAA Compliance. | ✕ WebRTC not provides compliance & privacy support. | ✓ Provide Compliance Standards and Privacy Regulations:
|
Cloud Recording Pricing | ✕
| NA |
|
RTMP Pricing | SD: $40 per 1000 minutes
HD: $80 per 1000 minutes | NA |
|
ILS Pricing |
Encoding:
| NA |
|
Storage Pricing | $13.5 per 1000 min | NA |
|
features | 100ms | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | ✕ Available | NA | ✓ VideoSDK offer the Volume Discount |
Video Conferencing | ✓ Yes | NA |
|
Analytics | ✓ Available, starting at $449/month | NA | ✓ VideoSDK offer Free Analytics with Dashboard |
Separate Pricing for Video and Audio | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Free 10,000 Minutes Every Month | ✓ Yes | NA | ✓ Yes |
Minimum Price for Video Calls | $4 per 1000 participant minutes | NA | $0.004 per participant minutes |
Minimum Price for Audio-only Calls | $1 per 1000 participant minutes | NA | $0.001 per participant minutes |
Advanced Firewall Control | ✕ Not specified | ✕ No | ✓ VideoSDK offer Free Firewall Control |
Compliance & Privacy | ✕ Support only HIPAA Compliance. | ✕ WebRTC not provides compliance & privacy support. | ✓ Provide Compliance Standards and Privacy Regulations:
|
Cloud Recording Pricing | ✕
| NA |
|
RTMP Pricing | SD: $40 per 1000 minutes
HD: $80 per 1000 minutes | NA |
|
ILS Pricing |
Encoding:
| NA |
|
Storage Pricing | $13.5 per 1000 min | NA |
|
Support Comparison : 100ms vs WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | 100ms | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Support | ✓ Yes, Paid | NA | ✓ Yes |
Cost |
| NA | Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ Not specified | ✕ No | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ Yes, based on plans | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ Paid Plans Only | ✕ No | ✓ Affordable SLA with 99.9% Uptime |
features | 100ms | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
|---|---|---|---|
Support | ✓ Yes, Paid | NA | ✓ Yes |
Cost |
| NA | Free |
Access to Testing | ✕ Not specified | ✕ No | ✓ All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | ✕ Yes, based on plans | ✕ No | ✓ Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | ✕ Paid Plans Only | ✕ No | ✓ Affordable SLA with 99.9% Uptime |
See why customers love Video SDK
“VideoSDK's well-structured product and efficient support team expedited integration. Their excellent user experience and well-defined documentation prompted us to switch from our previous provider.”
Kanishk Agrawal ,
Sr. Director - Technology at Judge Group
FAQ
