100ms vs WebRTC
A head-to-head comparison of 100ms and WebRTC, And what features and value does Video SDK offer?
100ms
is a platform that provides infrastructure and client-side SDKs for developers to build real-time, interactive audio-video experiences in their apps. It combines the capabilities of video conferencing (built over WebRTC), live streaming (built over HLS), and real-time databases.WebRTC
is a free and open-source initiative that empowers web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities through straightforward JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been finely tuned to effectively fulfill this objective.How Video SDK make a difference?
As you explore the realm of real-time communications, 100ms and WebRTC emerge as intriguing choices. 100ms presents contemporary APIs and collaborative features, while WebRTC stands as a dependable open-source solution.
However, Video SDK introduces a transformative factor. But what makes it stand out? This page conducts a comprehensive comparison between 100ms and WebRTC, unveiling the aspects that contribute to Video SDK's exceptional performance. An ideal solution tailored to meet your specific requirements!
Features Comparison : 100ms vs WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | 100ms | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
---|---|---|---|
No. of Participants (Including Hosts) | β Upto 10,000 participants | β WebRTC supports 2-3 participants only. | β VideoSDK supports upto Million Participants |
Ease of SDK Integration | β Easier integration with pre-built templates and reduced lines of code required | β WebRTC SDK is Complex for integration. | β VideoSDK requires less than 2 weeks for SDK integration |
Adpative Audio/Video Quality | β HD (720p) | β WebRTC offers adaptive audio/video quality | β VideoSDK provides best adaptive audio/video quality. |
Works behind the Firewall/Private-Network | β No | β No | β Yes |
Role Management, Permissions, Policy and Templates | β Limited | β WebRTC has limited Role Management, Permissions, Policy & Templates. | β VideoSDK offers Role management, Permissions, Policy and Templates |
Automatic video and audio track degrade due to bandwidth in-consistency | β Yes | β No | β Available |
Dynamic Layout for Studio and RTMP Live Streaming | β Available, Needs Manual Configuration | β No | β Available (No need for manual config.) |
Build collaborative features like chat, poll, Q & A, whiteboard etc. | β Available | β In WebRTC collaborative features is not available. | β VideoSDK offers a range of collaborative features |
Virtual Background, Live Transcription & ML Middleware | β Available | β No | β Easy Integration |
Webhooks | β Available for Advance Usecases only | β Yes | β Available |
Pricing Model | β Pay-as-you-go | NA | β Pay-as-You-Go Plan |
Interactive Live Streaming | β Available | NA | β VideoSDK supports Interactive Live Streaming |
Cloud Recording | β Available | NA | β VideoSDK offers Cloud Recording Capabilities |
Interactive Whiteboard | β Yes | β WebRTC not provides an interactive whiteboard feature. | β VideoSDK provides Interactive Whiteboard Feature |
Multi-platform | β Yes | β WebRTC supports multiple platforms for a wider reach. | β VideoSDK compatible with Multi-Platforms for greater reach |
Interactive Participant Support | β Limited Support | β WebRTC support limited Interactive Participants. | β Upto 5,000 |
Mobile Browser Support | β Yes (89% Browser Supported) | β 20% | β Video support 91% mobile browsers |
Automatic Audio/Video Degrade, Re-connectivity | β 720p only | β WebRTC supports automatic audio/video quality adjustments.. | β VideoSDK supports Reconnectivity with Audio/Video Quality adjustments.. |
Audio & Video powered by AI | β Not Available | β No | β Yes |
Independent of Open Source Dependency | β No | β WebRTC is dependent on open source. | β VideoSDK is not dependent on open source. |
Customised RTMP, Cloud Recording, HLS | β Available | β No | β Yes |
API for Specific Features (Collaborative Games, Polls, etc.) | β Available | β No | β Yes |
API for Social Features (Merging Rooms, Battles, Coins, Gifts Sending etc.) | β No | β No | β Yes |
Full HD Recording | β Yes | β WebRTC not supports full HD recording. | β VideoSDK supports full HD recording |
Open Source Templates | β Limited | β WebRTC heavily rely on open source templates. | β VideoSDK rely on open source templates |
Full Custom roles | β Supported | β Limited | β VideoSDK offer support for full custom roles |
HLS Streaming | β Available | β Yes | β VideoSDK supports HLS streaming |
Cost-effective | β Based On Use | β WebRTC is cost effective. | β VideoSDK is Cost Effective |
Prebuilt SDK | β Available | β WebRTC not provides prebuilt SDKs for easier integration. | β VideoSDK provides Prebuilt SDKs for easier integration |
Fully Customizable UI | β Yes | β Yes, but requires much efforts | β VideoSDK allows for Limited customizable UI |
Metaverse Platform Support | β No | β WebRTC support Metaverse platform. | β VideoSDK support Metaverse platform |
Session Analytics | β Available | β WebRTC not offer session analytics option. | β VideoSDK offer session analytics option |
Data Tracks | β No | β WebRTC not offer track data option. | β VideoSDK offer track data option |
Price Comparison : 100ms vs WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | 100ms | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
---|---|---|---|
Volume Discount | β Available | NA | β VideoSDK offer the Volume Discount |
Video Conferencing | β Yes | NA |
|
Analytics | β Available, starting at $449/monthβ | NA | β VideoSDK offer Free Analytics with Dashboard |
Separate Pricing for Video and Audio | β Yes | NA | β Yes |
Free 10,000 Minutes Every Month | β Yes | NA | β Yes |
Minimum Price for Video Calls | $4 per 1000 participant minutes | NA | $0.002 per participant minutes |
Minimum Price for Audio-only Calls | $1 per 1000 participant minutes | NA | $0.0006 per participant minutes |
Advanced Firewall Control | β Not specified | β No | β VideoSDK offer Free Firewall Control |
Compliance & Privacy | β Support only HIPAA Compliance. | β WebRTC not provides compliance & privacy support. | β Provide Compliance Standards and Privacy Regulations:
|
Cloud Recording Pricing | β
| NA |
|
RTMP Pricing | SD: $40 per 1000 minutes
HD: $80 per 1000 minutes | NA |
|
ILS Pricing |
Encoding:
| NA |
|
Storage Pricing | $13.5 per 1000 min | NA |
|
Support Comparison : 100ms vs WebRTC vs Video SDK
features | 100ms | WebRTC | VideoSDK |
---|---|---|---|
Support | β Yes, Paid | NA | β Yes |
Cost |
| NA | Free |
Access to Testing | β Not specified | β No | β All paid accounts get access to testing support from Video SDK |
Access to TAM / CS Engineer | β Yes, based on plans | β No | β Dedicated CS & Solution Engineers |
SLAs | β Paid Plans Only | β No | β Affordable SLA with 99.9% Uptime |
See why customers love Video SDK

βVideoSDK's well-structured product and efficient support team expedited integration. Their excellent user experience and well-defined documentation prompted us to switch from our previous provider.β
Kanishk Agrawal ,
Sr. Director - Technology at Judge Group
FAQ